USING THE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL TO PREDICT LECTURERS’ ACCEPTANCE OF AUGMENTED REALITY NOTES

Received: 10th August 2022; Revised: 31st October 2022, 11th December 2022, 21st December 2022; Accepted: 28th December 2022

Authors

  • Karthega Shanmugam Lecturer, Department of Electrical Engineering, Polytechnic Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20319/dv4.4461

Keywords:

Augmented Reality, Technology Acceptance Model, Wireless Communication, Polytechnics

Abstract

Teaching and learning have already been leaping forward by adding advanced technologies such as augmented reality. The main purpose of this study is to predict Malaysian Polytechnic lecturers who teach Wireless Communication subject, on their acceptance level of incorporating Augmented reality into learning material using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The questionnaire was distributed to 40 polytechnic lecturers who teach this subject nationwide. Pearson Correlation analysis using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software was used to test all the hypotheses. The data analysis indicates that about 87.5 % of Malaysian polytechnic lecturers who teach wireless communication subject currently accept to incorporate AR in that subject. Using Technology Acceptance Model, the study reveals that lecturers perceived that Augmented Reality is easy to use (PEOU), and useful (PU) and therefore has a positive attitude (ATU) towards using it. This results in positive behavioral intention (BI) to use AR in their teaching and learning material for this subject. This study emphasizes on TAM model to understand and explain behavioral intention to use Augmented Reality among Malaysian polytechnic lecturers who teach wireless communication subject. However, the scope of this study can be widened by investigating the acceptance level for other subjects too.

References

Abdullah, N., Baskaran, V., Mustafa, Z., Ali, S., & Zaini, S. (2022). Augmented Reality: The Effect in Students’ Achievement, Satisfaction and Interest in Science Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research Vol.21 No:5. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.5.17

Abu Bakar, S., Othman, N., & Nasir, A. (2022). User Acceptance and Usability of Augmented Reality (Ar) Polimas Tour. Journal on Technical and Vocational Education Vol 7 No 1.

Alejandro Álvarez-Marín, J. Ángel Velázquez-Iturbide 2, & Mauricio Castillo-Vergara. (2021). Technology Acceptance of an Interactive Augmented Reality App on Resistive Circuits for Engineering Students. Electronics. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10111286

Anuar, S., Nizar, N., & Ismail, M. (2021). The Impact of Using Augmented Reality as Teaching Material on Students' Motivation. Asian Journal of Vocational Education and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 1.

Ayman A. A. (2014). Accepting Moodle by academic staff at the University of Jordon: applying and extending TAM in Technical Support Factors. European Scientific Journal edition vol.10, No.18.

Boudebza M. (2017). The impact of a proposed educational program using the mini-games to improve. 15th International Conference on Teaching, Education, and Learning (ICTEL), 14-15.

Carmigniani, J., & Furht, B. (2011). Augmented Reality: On Overview. In Handbook of Augmented Reality. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6_1

Darren, Y., EongPoh, P., & YingTang, S. (2022). Assessing the impact of augmented reality application on students’ learning motivation in chemical engineering. Education for Chemical Engineers Volume 39, Pages 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2022.02.004

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly Vol. 13, No. 3, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dianah S. A. B., Selamat, A., Krejcar, O., Maresova, P. & Thanh N. N. (2020). Digital Learning Demand for Future Education. Informatics 2020, 7, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7020013

Fussell, S. G. & Truong, D. (2021). Using virtual reality for dynamic learning: an extended technology acceptance model. Virtual Reality volume 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00554-x

Gavaldon-Hernandez G., Gerboles-Sanchez, A., & Saez de A. F. (2017). Use of digital graphic narratives with preservice teachers as a mediated learning. 15th International Conference on Teaching, Education, and Learning (ICTEL), 19.

Gurevych, R., Silvester, A., Mokliuk, M., Shaposhnikova, I., Gordiichuk, G., & Saiapina, S. (2021). Using Augmented Reality Technology in Higher Education Institutions. Postmodern Openings Vol. 12 Issue 2, p109-132. 24p. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.2/299

Hui-Tzu H. & Chih-Cheng L. (2021). Extending the technology acceptance model of college learners' mobile-assisted language learning by incorporating psychological constructs. British Journal of Education technology.

Johar, S., & Abdullah, N. (2019). Pembangunan e-Modul Augmented Reality bagi Subjek Semiconductor Devices untuk Guru TVET. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners Vol 4 No. 2.

Leung, W. S. & Blauw, F. F. (2020). An augmented reality approach to delivering a connected digital forensics training experience. Information Science and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1465-4_36

Oyman, M. Dondu, B. & Serhat O. (2022). Extending the technology acceptance model to explain how perceived augmented reality affects consumers' perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior Volume 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107127

Papakostas, C., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Tsioropoulos, C. (2022). User acceptance of augmented reality welding simulator in engineering training. Education and Information Technologies, 791–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10418-7

Salwa, A., Nurhuda N. & Muhamad A. I. (2021). The Impact of Using Augmented Reality as Teaching Material on Students' Motivation. Asian Journal of Vocational Education and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 1.

Tolba, R., Elarif, T. & Fayed, Z. T. (2021). Augmented Reality in Technology-Enhanced Learning: International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences Vol.22, No.1, 44-59. https://doi.org/10.21608/IJICIS.2022.97513.1121

Vásquez-Carbonell, M. (2022). A Systematic Literature Review of Augmented Reality in Engineering Education: Hardware, Software, Student Motivation & Development Recommendations. Early Childhood and Technologies at School and Home No. 41. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2022.41.249-267

Zulfabli, H. M., Ismalina, H. N., Amaral, T., & Ahmad, S. (2019). Product development of mechanical practice: Augmented reality (AR) approach. AIP Conference Proceedings Volume 2129, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5118063

Downloads

Published

2023-01-16

How to Cite

Shanmugam, K. (2023). USING THE TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL TO PREDICT LECTURERS’ ACCEPTANCE OF AUGMENTED REALITY NOTES: Received: 10th August 2022; Revised: 31st October 2022, 11th December 2022, 21st December 2022; Accepted: 28th December 2022. Docens Series in Education, 4(.), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.20319/dv4.4461