UNLOCKING COGNITIVE ENGAGEMENT IN LEARNING OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: DYNAMICS AND DRIVERS
Received: 17th May 2024 Revised: 10th July 2024. 2nd August 2024 Accepted: 21st May 2024
Keywords:
Cognitive Engagement, Individual Factors, Familial Factors, Institutional FactorsAbstract
This research paper explores the multi-dimensional factors influencing cognitive engagement among university students in Shanghai, integrating individual, familial, and institutional dynamics. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the study draws on data from the "China College Student Survey (CCSS)" to measure cognitive engagement through a specifically designed Likert scale. The study sample consists of 1,452 valid responses from 1,600 distributed questionnaires across six universities. Through descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression analyses, the research identifies significant determinants of cognitive engagement. Key findings indicate that cognitive engagement is profoundly influenced not only by individual characteristics—such as holding leadership positions—but also by familial factors like parental education and social networks, as well as comprehensive institutional factors including teaching quality and university infrastructure. Notably, urban-rural backgrounds and family economic conditions emerge as significant moderators, affecting how institutional and familial inputs influence students’ cognitive engagement. Results underscore the critical role of tailored educational strategies and supportive familial and institutional environments in enhancing cognitive engagement. The research contributes to educational theory by providing empirical support for the integration of multi-dimensional factors in understanding student engagement, offering actionable insights for educational policy makers and institution administrators aiming to foster enriched learning environments.
References
Amiri, L., Ebrahimi Moghadam, H., & Babakhani, N. (2019). Structural model of predicting academic engagement based on cognitive ability and socioeconomic status by mediating academic enthusiasm in students. Journal of psychologicalscience, 18(74), 215-222. https://psychologicalscience.ir/browse.php?a_id=92&sid=1&slc_lang=en&ftxt=1
Arievitch, I. M. (2020). Reprint of: The vision of Developmental Teaching and Learning and Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives. Learning, culture and social interaction, 27, 100473.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.01.007
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100473
Baker, R. S., & Gowda, S. M. (2010). An analysis of the differences in the frequency of students' disengagement in urban, rural, and suburban high schools. Educational data mining 2010. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=a2d38c00eb9d90b4c6b986289fa8903089a988df#page=23
Barnes, S. J., Pressey, A. D., & Scornavacca, E. (2019). Mobile ubiquity: Understanding the relationship between cognitive absorption, smartphone addiction and social network services. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.013
Ben-Eliyahu, A., Moore, D., Dorph, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts. Contemporary educational psychology, 53, 87-105. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X17300334
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.