Vol. 6 (2024)
Emerging Trends in Education

Articles

SCRIPT RELATIVITY IN PSYCHOLINGUISTICS AND SOCIOLINGUISTICS: WRITING SYSTEMS AS A CATALYST FOR COGNITION AND CULTURE: Received: 07th August 2023; Revised: 26th December 2023; Accepted: 29th December 2023

Published 2024-03-15

  • Hye K. Pae
    • ,
  • Gulbahar H. Beckett

Hye K. Pae
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, U.S.A

Gulbahar H. Beckett
Iowa State University, Ames, IA, U.S.A.

Abstract

Script relativity posits that the writing system in which we read affects our thinking, information processing, cognitive mapping, and thought patterns. Given that script effects have been investigated primarily in psycholinguistics, this paper discusses the potential to extend the scope and sequence of research to a broader level of sociolinguistics. As the microscopic psycholinguistic analysis can be complemented by a macroscopic sociolinguistic view, the interplay among cognitive, linguocultural, and sociocultural variables can facilitate our holistic understanding of script effects. To this end, this paper provides an account of writing systems as a catalyst for building cognition and culture. The dynamic interaction between individual language processing (psycholinguistics) and language use in social and cultural contexts (sociolinguistics) is discussed, which has both theoretical and methodological implications for future research, policy, and practice.

Keywords

Script Relativity, Semiotics, Cognition, Culture, Psycholinguistics, Sociolinguistics

PDF

References

  1. Bergen, B. K., & Chan Lau, T. T. (2012). Writing direction affects how people map space onto time. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00109
  2. Chang, L.-Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2018). Visual factors in writing system variation: Measurement and implications for reading. In H. K. Pae (Ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages (pp. 49–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.7.03cha
  3. Cook, V. (2015). Meaning and material in the language of the street. Social Semiotics, 25(1), 81-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.964025
  4. Daoudi, A. (2011). Globalization and e-Arabic: The emergence of a new language at the literal and figurative levels. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics, 38, 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401200431_006
  5. Domashevskaya, D., Shishmareva, T., & Khamaeva, E. (2022). Chinese ideographic writing as a picture of the world: theoretical approach. SHS Web of Conferences, 134, 00142, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213400142
  6. J. Jin & S. Ke (Eds). Chinese language education and second language Chinese acquisition: An interface with Chinese linguistics. Springer.
  7. Luo, X., & Pae, H. K. (2024; under review). The effects of Chinese compound characters’ neighborhood size and consistency on reading mono-and di-characters words by native and nonnative speakers of Chinese.
  8. Matsuda, Y. (2023). Script-switching in Japanese pop culture: a social semiotic multimodal approach. Visual Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572231155586
  9. McDonald, E. (2012). Aristotle, Saussure, Kress on speech and writing: Language as paradigm for the semiotic? Language and Communication, 32, 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2012.04.007
  10. Pae, H. K. (2020). Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0
  11. Pae, H. K. (2020a). From linguistic relativity to script relativity. In H. K. Pae, Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (pp. 37-58). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0_3
  12. Pae, H. K. (2020b). The impact of digital text. In H. K. Pae, Script effects as the hidden drive of the mind, cognition, and culture (pp. 209-217). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55152-0_11
  13. Pae, H. K. (2022). Toward a script relativity hypothesis: Focused research agenda for psycholinguistic experiments in the science of reading. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 6, 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-022-00103-1
  14. Pae, H. K. (2024). Analyzing the Korean alphabet: The science of Hangul. Springer. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/book/1144298835
  15. Pae, H. K., Sun, J., Luo, X., Ai, H., Ma, F, Yang, N., & Xia, D. (2021) Linguocultural cognition
  16. manifested in spoken narratives in L2 English by native Chinese and Korean speakers. Journal of Cultural and Cognitive Science, 5(3), 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-021-00088-3
  17. Pagel, M. (2017). Q&A: What is human language, when did it evolve and why should we care? BMC Biology, 15(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0405-3
  18. Pegado, F. (2022). Written language acquisition is both shaped by and has an impact on brain functioning and cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16-2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.819956
  19. Peng, X. (2017). Stroke systems in Chinese characters: A systemic functional perspective on simplified regular script. Semiotica, 218, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0111
  20. Proskurin, S. G. (2015). Semiotics and writing systems. Semiotica, 205, 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0007
  21. Sun, J., Pae, H. K., & Ai (2022). The recognition of coordinative compound words by learners of Chinese as a foreign language: A mixed methods study. Foreign Language Annals, 54, 923-951. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12586
  22. Unseth, P. (2005). Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Journal of Written Language & Literacy, 8(1), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.02uns
  23. Wikipedia. (2023). Sociolinguistics. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociolinguistics
  24. Winskel, H. (2022). Script relativity hypothesis: Evidence from reading with different spatial layouts and varied lexical tones. Reading and Writing, 35(6), 1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10225-7